The inquisitorial system is structurally optimized for a first principles approach because both reject the concept of conflict as a game to be won. In an adversarial system, truth is a byproduct of two competing sides arguing their positions. In an inquisitorial system, truth is an active, objective target pursued directly by a neutral authority.
The mechanics of the inquisitorial system naturally accommodate the engineering mindset of first principles. An inquisitorial judge can actively question parties to uncover why a dispute occurred, not just what rules were broken. This structural power allows the court to pierce through superficial legal claims and address the underlying operational or psychological interests.
Inquisitorial magistrates actively manage a file from day one, shaping the scope of the inquiry. This proactive stance matches the first principles prevention model of utilizing standing neutrals to defuse issues before they mutate into full-scale litigation.